Successful Workplaces Green/Sustainability Women Veterans Young Careerists Public Policy and Advocacy

Civil Rights

Civil Rights

Background | Legislation | Updates | Talking Points | Resources | Action

Background

Despite significant advances for women in the US and around the world, sex discrimination is not a thing of the past and progress is not irreversible. Laws to prevent sex discrimination are not enough, because they contain loopholes, are inconsistently interpreted, and may be weakened by amendment or repeal. International conventions and constitutional amendments provide a guarantee of equality that shifts the burden away from those fighting discrimination and places it where it belongs, on those who would discriminate.

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), first proposed in 1923, is still not part of the U.S. Constitution. The ERA reads, “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” In 1972, Congress passed the ERA and the amendment was sent to the states for ratification. Over the course of 10 years, the ERA was ratified by 35 of the 38 states required to ratify the law and make it a permanent part of the US Constitution. The 15 states that have not ratified the ERA are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia.

To attain progress in equality for women on an international level, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW/ Women's Treaty) was created to establish international standards regarding discrimination on the basis of sex and to establish rights for women. CEDAW was decades in the making. The United Nations' adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 focused public attention on the international human rights agenda. However, 50 years later, the majority of the world's women and girls remained excluded from the prevailing vision of human rights and continued to lack basic legal rights in countries around the world.

At the First World Conference on Women in Mexico City in 1975, a call was made to develop a Women's Convention to comprehensively address women's rights within political, cultural, economic, social and family life and CEDAW was created,

In 1979, the United Nations General Assembly officially adopted the Women's Treaty. The Treaty calls for women around the world to have:
         • rights to equal work, pay, benefits and safe working conditions;
         • protection in political activities; and
         • minimum age for marriage.

From the time the UN approved the treaty, supporters of women's rights called on the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty barring abuses against women. The U.S. stands out as the only industrialized nation that has failed to ratify CEDAW.

Although President Carter signed the agreement in 1980, the United States did not sign the treaty until September 2000. Currently, 166 countries have consented to be bound by the provisions of CEDAW. The treaty cannot go into effect, however, until 20 countries have ratified it. The United States must ratify the treaty in accordance with the procedures outlined by the United States Constitution. According to Article II, Section 2, the President is empowered to make treaties by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

BPW/USA believes the ratification of the ERA and passage of CEDAW are vital to ending sex discrimination and women’s inequality. 

 

Legislation

  • The Women’s Equality Amendment prohibits denial or abridgment of the equality of rights under the law by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
  • The United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is a comprehensive international treaty guaranteeing women’s human rights and the prevention of discrimination against women. CEDAW provides a universal international standard for women’s human rights — a framework for governmental policy to combat gender inequality.

 

Updates

Would a Female Supreme Court Justice Make a Difference?
May 3, 2009
Supreme Court Justice David Souter announced his retirement and without taking a breath speculation about his potential replacement began. BPW asks what does the make-up of the Supreme Court mean for sex discrimination? A great deal it turns out. Researchers have studied the votes of federal court of appeals judges in many areas of the law. For the most part, they found no difference in the voting patterns of male and female judges, except when it comes to sex discrimination cases. There, they found that female judges are approximately 10 percent more likely to rule in favor of the party bringing the discrimination claim. They also found that the presence of a female judge causes male judges to vote differently. When male and female judges serve together to decide a sex discrimination case, the male judges are nearly 15 percent more likely to rule in favor of the party alleging discrimination than when they sit with male judges only. Read more
 

ERA Ratification in the States
July 1, 2008
Efforts to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment are underway many states, most notably in Illinois, Missouri and Florida - with campaigns developing in Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana and Oklahoma. In all of the unratified states, BPW/USA members have taken a lead in the quest for ratification. There are a variety of ways that BPW/USA members can get involved with advocating for the ERA. If you live in an unratified state and no action is being taken to lobby for the ERA consider:

  • Starting an ERA coalition 
  • Making sure the ERA gets introduced in your state legislature annually
  • Educating others about the ERA. Half the battle in getting support for the ERA is educating people about it.

 

Resources

ERA Public Policy Webinar

Equal Rights Amendment Resource Center
Your one stop shop for Equal Rights Amendment Information!

Sample ERA State Bills

US Department of Justice-Civil Rights Division

Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
CivilRights.org is a collaboration of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund. Its mission: to serve as the site of record for relevant and up-to-the minute civil rights news and information.

State-based ERA organizations